Mac mini 2012 final cut pro performance

Symptom #1 FCP X is just plain slow, all the time, doing everything.

Page content loaded. Oct 23, 6: Oct 23, 8: Going for the cheapest lowest spec machine around, can I suggest that you can expect the performance results will match. You cannot expect to get multi tracks of full HD all running together and render time that fly, expect some waiting.

• All replies.
• mac eyebrow pencil how to open.
• psp media go mac download?
• different versions of office for mac.
• Apple Footer!
• minecraft bukkit server download mac 1.6.2;

If going this path seriously consider working with proxies. The HDD read and write speeds will give you some idea as to what performance you can expect. Oct 24, I just went into the Apple Store today to talk to someone about this very question. The big disappointment to me in the new mini is that the mid-level not server used to have a discrete graphics card -- and now none of the minis offer anything other than the integrated graphics chipsets But the more filters and full HD tracks you're trying to composite or render at once, the more a dedicated GPU will help.

So it sounds like if you're not doing anything too fancy, the mini should be great. So if you're going for simple video editing I work for a church; we do simple video interviews without a lot of effects or compositing , I'm looking at the quad-core i7 mac mini as a sweet little machine. Oct 24, 2: What I'm looking at is 3 tracks of full HD.

The New Mac Mini and Final Cut Pro X

Oct 25, 5: Go into an Apple store. Use a few of their stock movie HD files to build a multicam project on the Mini. Test it for playing in real time — add titles, effects, whatever. Export it and note how long it takes. Do the same thing on a MBPr. Very interesting. The MBPr "won" that speed test. Oct 25, 6: No problems. Of course he is doing pretty simple stuff. Premiere is not optimized to the same extent, yet. I would expect similar results for After Effects. If your principle goal for a computer is editing, the Mac mini is an excellent choice.

NOT because the Mac mini creates poorer-looking images, simply that the render times will be longer. In most cases, video compression is CPU-based.

While I have not tested this yet, I would expect the new Mac mini to be an excellent video compression system. As well, the best way to use a multi-computer network is when your media is stored on a server and consists of multiple movies. Using multiple computers to compress a single long movie into either H.

Mac Mini late 2014 and Final Cut Pro X

Other codecs, including AVC-Intra, can also be segmented and distributed. And, while a single H. While 10 Gb Ethernet would give me ten times the speed, in order to take advantage of it, I would need to upgrade my server, replace my data switch, and re-cable my edit suites with upgraded Cat 6 Ethernet cabling. Um, not today. For new setups, 10 Gb Ethernet is the way to go. This also makes for a simple setup using the Shared Computers feature in Compressor.

The new Mac mini is very impressive for editing. The speed of its internal storage is breath-taking, the 6-core CPU has plenty of pep and the overall operation for editing is very smooth. I like the iMac because of its screen quality and its faster GPU. And, the Mac mini requires that you purchase a monitor, keyboard and mouse separately; items which are bundled with the purchase of an iMac.

For new users, that raises the purchase price of a Mac mini. And… it has ports! This Mini with an eGPU will scream.

Hands-On: Video Editing with Final Cut Pro X and the 2018 Mac mini

Very useful information once again, Larry. Some people need faster renders, others can live without them. Guess what! Not one problem. FCP X hummms. Best Regards, -Ray Fleischmann-. If it is affected, then you have that extra port on the Mini to try using for the sound card. I moved away from FireWire a long time ago.

If it is downstream, it will run at FW speeds. I am now in week two running on the new Mac Mini with Premiere Pro. Adobe no longer supports my MacPro El Cap. My work does not go beyond 1k editing.

I have the 3. Thanks Larry. Thanks for the review. How do you think it will handle 4k video 8bit or 10bit with some titles, some color correction and maybe a few transitions? Color correction is heavily dependent upon the GPU. The administrator has disabled public write access. You probably found the slowest computer to edit on that Apple is selling except for the Macbook. Two things: So you'd be stuck with 4GB.

The graphics is also pretty slow, which means renders that are GPU assisted are they on Intel? Take a look at some older bare feats articles and see what you'd be ok with for render times: Last Edit: I want to be able to crop videos, set in and out times, do cool transitions.

The New Mac Mini and Final Cut Pro X

Also, I need to be able to export the audio separately so I can do the soundtrack in Digital Performer. I have FCP v7 on an old G5 and it seems to have plenty of capability. The problem is that machine shock victim needs to be retired and my main mac iMac 15years old can't download FCPx says graphics card issue.

• adobe photoshop cs6 trial for mac.
• sugar bytes artillery 2.3.0 mac osx;
• mac keyboard function keys windows.
• Mac Mini late and Final Cut Pro X | MacRumors Forums.

It seems you can't get older versions of FCP. So, I'm thinking to retire both and consolidate onto a not break the bank machine and buy the new FCPX. I've checked ebay, etc. I'd prefer longer render times for a new machine with a warranty I suppose. I was planning to get an external hard drive, will that help much with performance?

Couple other options in my area more powerful mac minis, although used: Bigger goals would be kickstarter videos. So, 5 minutes will be probably the longest video I'll need to make. I appreciate all the help! FCPX should run fine on that as it meets the minimum requirements, however I don't recommend editing anything more than a single stream of or lower res video, i.

If you can manage to afford the 2.