Mac os based off linux

Its interface, known as Aqua , is built on a Unix foundation. Although it has much of the look and feel of the former Mac OS , features such as preemptive multitasking, symmetric multiprocessing, multithreading, and protected memory give Mac OS X improved stability and performance. Mac OS X: This is the version most Macintosh owners should use.

It is a consumer operating system designed for use on your personal computer. Mac OS X Server: This is Apple's server operating system. I tried to use my three-year-old FreeBSD 8. The new motherboard had a pretty common Realtek Gbit NIC, but apparently it reported a hardware revision that was too new for the Realtek driver compiled into the kernel.

So I first had to compile a new kernel that did NOT include the Realtek driver, else I could not load an alternative driver as a module. Then I had to try and build a new Realtek driver against my old kernel source.

But it seems the code provided by Realtek was outdated as well. It still did not recognize my chip. So I tried modifying the code somewhat. I did manage to get the card detected, and to get the proper device to show up, but I never got it to work. In Windows however it was dead simple: I wish these alternative OSes would focus more on modularity and binary compatibility like that.

It makes things a lot easier for end-users if they can just download a driver and go, without having to worry about kernel versions, building drivers from source, manually loading modules etc. Having source code should not be an excuse for not having a proper user-friendly way of managing drivers. Rebuilding kernels and drivers, or even upgrading the whole OS just to get a common NIC working is just not my idea of a good system.

I know which one I will choose whenever I can and not let a little extra work rule who controls my data. As far as someone else controlling your data, iCloud storage is optional in OS X it can be disabled from within the system preferences.

Cross-platform cloud storage already exists in the form of DropBox, which is available for Linux too — and can be found in most repositories. Put differently, cloud storage whatever the brand name can always be easily disabled, or not installed at all. Microsoft has SkyDrive. Whoever has the data has the control. Just the ability of a 3rd party to house data with security issues is not the bigger issue.

I agree that Cloud is gimmicky and has a certain specific definition right now, but it has a bigger definition to those that see what freedoms it will take away, create less competition to those few currently controlling our computing with greater marketshare. Maybe a welcome change for those who do not like DIY, prefer renting to owning, want goverment and a few established businesses to tell them what they get and need at what price, and generally would not use computers if they did not have to.

IMO it is the equivalent of being mandated to take public transportation with ability to maybe choose the color and style of your chair and maybe some extra amenities like headphones and a pillow, or a desk to work on. With high bandwidth and greater profit for companies we are having our computing pulled back into the dumb terminal age in order control our lives through computing services rather than us using computers for ourselves. I feel like the chicken that says the sky or cloud is falling.

Gone will be the days when computing could elevate the hardworking little guys to compete with the big guys since and innovation reigned — welcome back the days when IBM dictated things…the name just changed to Applesoft and we wait in line to support it…ironic. As MacOS9 pointed out, using cloud services are optional. You can even host your own services if you choose.

Therefore, your argument about others controlling your data are moot. In regards to your other criticisms of OS X, there are tons of customizations. They mean very different things. The cost of the hardware can be a bit more expensive, but it also comes with support.

Your Answer

I know of no Linux Stores where you can speak to Linux Geniuses. Some people need their hardware and software to work without having to tweak things and search on forums looking for help. These people are willing to pay a bit more for that. I usually run my computers for 5 to 10 yrs. Heck, I had my beige PowerMac from the mid s running for 13 yrs.

What is a platform anyway? To deny that means you are another one of those stupid Apple worshippers, i. I will be turning your name and info over to my Taliban friends. Contact Scali for more detailed info. Likewise, on most FTP servers, including kernel. You can easily do that. Here is the link http: If an OS internally spell its name started small-case then its not mandatory to spell the name the way it does internally.

1. Apple’s OS X is NOT linux! | Scali's OpenBlog™;
2. 5 Linux Distributions That Look Like MacOS.
3. osx - Is macOS an Unix distribution? - Unix & Linux Stack Exchange.
4. Mac OS X Is Not a Linux Distribution but ....
5. how to reset browser settings on mac.

Yes you agree that the trademarked names are only used when we spell the name. Generally the name internally used by the OS is not used always. Unlike BSD, they linux have their own pedigree. So UNIX and linux may be cousins but not identical twins. Enterprises once designed softwares for windows will alyas be helpless if the are asked to port their programs for OS X or ubuntu. Piracy does their advertisement automatically.

Even people will always look at me strangely and make some wrong assumption about me, mocking me all the time if I jump to anything else other than Windows. This is more or less the same every corner of this planet. WIn 8 crash prone e. For UNIX and linux, I deeply respect them both but no plan to use them now, if the time comes I will test them surely. Desktop-oriented users seem to be moving to systemd, while server-oriented users prefer the more traditional UNIX startup scripts. Would be an interesting development if this systemd-thing would actually help FreeBSD marketshare.

Interesting discussion here, with interesting historical background, many thanks for that. Later, I bought a NeXTstation yes! After starting to work at my employeer of choice, I was forced to use WIndows 3. But I also enjoy openSuse, btw. I had a hard time in the beginning to get all my hardware with linux to work, but due to the huge and extremly friendly linux internet community, I made it.

Now I am enjoing relatively old PCs, which boot and shutdown in seconds, do not bother me with Virus kind of things etc. First impression: They all work, and all have their pros and cons. If Apple would not follow this closed box principle where I often feel like in a prison, I would have completely switched to them, simply because it works right from the beginning as long as you do not leave their ecosystem.

But I llke the openess of linux which allows me to configure the system completely to my desire, the idea of open source and I have deepest respect for these people, who do all this nice work without any commercial interest. Well, there certainly is commercial interest in linux. See here for example: Windows can also be installed directly onto Intel Macs if you like, if you prefer more hardware compatibility than available with Linux.

On Linux, the Airport control panel, however, is severely outdated not having been updated in more than 10 yrs. In short: You probably mean such things as WebKit that was first used in Konqueror in KDE flavors of Linux…and now more famously is the underpinning to the Safari web browser. No far more than that, many libraries that power software we use every day, a lot of open source stuff that powers a lot of things going on behind the scenes.

The whole point of this article is that there are so many people who are clueless about UNIX, and think that everything that is remotely UNIX is linux. You could see it as an early fork. Interesting stuff…. I do know that Linus started on linux because he wanted a kernel for MINIX, which Tanenbaum was not interested in developing at that time. Fascinating stuff…I learn something new every day on this forum….

From what I could gather at that link, it mentions what was already said here on the blog, that OS X is not Linux. Upon installation of the system on a computer or in this case VirtualBox , the initial account I am given is by default an administrator account. I then proceed to create another couple of accounts, one administrator, the other standard, and I then change the initial account that I was first given on the computer upon installation from administrative to standard.

In the command terminal, I am — from the new administrative account — able to cd into the new standard account that I made — but I am not able to cd into the standard account that was previously an administrator account. In fact, the cmd prompt tells me that the administrative-turned-standard account is either not accessible or does not exist — does this have something to do with the fact that the account in question underwent a status change from administrator to standard user?

Perhaps some subtle registry corruption there that I need to dig into? Any feedback on the issue will be read with great interest. Thanks all, and keep up the good work with the stimulating blog. Would have to create installation with Admin enabled and used at least once. I have none with such configuration since XP However, you should have just disabled it. Much better idea and IIRC recommended action Altering built-in account might have anomalous, unexpected effects.

I did use the administrative-turned-standard account a few times as administrator before transforming it to standard, but will see how things go — Windows Update is working properly across all accounts, which is good to know.

• mac in a sac bottle green.
• sectie einde word verwijderen mac;
• Both operating systems share the same roots?
• 5 Linux Distributions That Look Like MacOS - It's FOSS.
• .
• waterfall chart excel 2016 mac!

I noticed the peculiarity of trying to cd from an administrative account into a previous administrator account after tweaking a Windows 8. They have created their own desktop environment along with a range of other Deepin specific applications that blend perfectly to give you an aesthetic feel. As you can see in the video above, Deepin Linux is undoubtedly one of the most beautiful Linux distribution ever. The Deepin team is based in China and their primary target is Chinese audience and hence some of their applications are not available in other languages.

This is an area where they can certainly improve. BackSlash Linux is relatively new and relatively unknown entrant in the Linux distribution world. It is based on Ubuntu and follows a release cycle similar to Ubuntu. While it is available for a free download, you also have the option to buy support.

Unlike the above mentioned MacOS look alike Linux distributions, Gmac is not a full-fledged distribution. Gmac already does it for you. Plus you get to keep your Ubuntu distribution. There is not enough information available about Trenta OS at this time. Focus has been kept on the looks and UI. Terminal and some other regular applications are also tweaked to make it look like MacOS. You can also watch it on GitHub. Puppy Linux is one of the best lightweight Linux distributions for older computers. There is one problem with it, though.

In a few months, the support for this version would end. Moreover, I am not sure if Macpup is being actively developed as well. Maybe back in it might have looked like MacOS but not anymore. Apricity OS has been discontinued. Apricity OS is one of my favorite Arch based Linux distributions.

You can even call it a cloud centric Linux distribution.