Do mac cosmetics test on animals 2012

Some products may be required by law in a few countries to undergo additional safety testing, including animal testing. In these instances, Avon will first attempt to persuade the requesting authority to accept non-animal test data. Some scientific or regulatory authorities may still conduct or require animal testing by law of cosmetic products or ingredients to demonstrate safety.

For example, before we are able to import any of our products into China, the Chinese government requires all importers of cosmetics, including us, to pay for animal testing that is conducted by a government-mandated laboratory in China. As a global company, we are committed to providing our products and services to our consumers where they live, and we must comply with all legal requirements in the countries where we do business. For instance, in January Governor Geraldo Alckmin signed a bill that prohibited cosmetics testing on animals in Sao Paulo, Brazil. China has also decided to lift the animal testing requirement on ordinary cosmetics produced and sold in that country.

Unfortunately, animal testing is still required in several locations around the world. Producing reliable fact-checking and thorough investigative reporting requires significant resources. The FAQ page also contains this paragraph: What can you do? As a consumer, using your voice is important. There are several things that you can do: Support cruelty-free brands. There are SO many out there!

Be sure to let them know that them being cruelty-free matters to you. If you only purchase vegan products, also let them know that offering vegan options is important to you as well. Let MAC know that you will no longer be supporting them and purchasing their products.

Shoot them an email, a tweet, or leave them a Facebook or Instagram comment. Let them know that a brand being cruelty-free is important to you as a consumer, and since they are not cruelty-free they do not have your support. Share this post and help spread awareness.

Cruelty-free beauty can be a confusing landscape, but helping share information helps everyone. Check your inbox for a welcome message!

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again. Enter Your Email Here. Share this: Thursday - March 8, Tashina Combs Hi! Previous Post Next Post.

1. Is MAC Cruelty-Free?.
2. how to merge pdf files mac yosemite?
3. MAC Cosmetics Is No Longer Cruelty-Free.
4. how do i use numbers on my mac.
5. Need Help?;

Wednesday - July 16, Reply Amy Friday - October 26, at 2: Reply Paige Sunday - April 1, at 1: Reply Natasha Friday - March 16, at 7: Reply erika Friday - March 9, at Reply Kristin Friday - March 9, at 6: Acually, sending products back to Mac may not be such a bad idea. I wonder what would happen if everyone demanded their money back? I do agree that anyone who purchased products recently and is upset should return them.

Why not? But I am so sorry, Phyrra, and all of you who have been supporters. I just remember signing lots of petitions and seeing lots of horrible photos. It would seem it worked, that Revlon is cruelty free? MUFE it is! This is crazy! Thank you so much for sharing this, Phyrra. This is very sad. Those of us who prefer not to buy products tested on animals are going to have to be more vigilant about the companies we give our money to. To suddenly change that policy without making it known is, in my opinion, the equivalent of LYING to their customers.

In my mind, testing is testing. Why start now?

OneGreenPlanet Newsletter

I agree. I honestly have more respect for companies that can at least be up front about it than ones who try to hide it. Thank you for writing this post Phyrra. I understand that MAC is very personal to a lot of us. When did you get that response from Nars? I totally agree with you Phyrra. I am letting my consultantship lapse.

What can you do?

Btw I remembered why my nars info was conflicting. Wow has MAC gone backwards or what? In this days they MUST know this will hurt them at least a little, when so many popular brands have already quit experimenting to improve their image.

• audio interface firewire 800 mac!
• vlc media player mac 10.5.8.
• dvd burner mac free no watermark?
• Heartbroken by MAC.
• MAC Is Finally Speaking Out Amid Criticism for Animal Testing;
• !

As much as I love make up, I find it unbelievable that animals need to suffer because we want to put pretty colours in our bodies. So I am conflicted ther.

Thanks for telling Phyrra! Official statement: Nars does not test on animals, nor do we have any other parties, including our suppliers, conduct animal testing on our behalf. Nars uses only the highest quality ingredients which have a proven safety record and are widely used in the cosmetics industry. Read more: Thank you so much for sharing this Jen! Regarding Nars, they are owned by Shiseido which is publicly known to test on animals.

So if you buy Nars, the profits go back to Shisedo.

FACT CHECK: Animal Testing Resumes for Avon, Mary Kay, and Estée Lauder?

There are a lot of companies that claim cruelty-free in statements, back of products, etc. Take for example, Laura Geller.



They claim to not test on animals, but a closer look reveals they do not monitor their suppliers at all. I know that as they directly emailed me that response. This is truly a personal choice on how far you go with a boycott. I follow the PETA guidelnes for the most part.

Animal Testing Resumes for Avon, Mary Kay, and Estée Lauder?

And what is worse about them Poor Estee would not have approved is that they are not trying AT ALL to work with the Chinese to improve standards and encourage alternatives. Avon and Mary Kay, although now back on the bad list, are at least making attempts. I will still boycott them, but I have a bit more respect for them for their efforts. The bottom line is this: These are cosmetics, folks, not medicines. MAC is being sold in China and therefore, the brand is being tested on animals.

This is a known fact, not conjecture anymore and not rumor. And,you know what? I am now discovering other companies that I like equally. I have contacted every cosmetics company that I have added to the ban. They need to fully know our outrage! Then since this is about money, respond in kind and withhold yours. Thanks, Phyrra. PETA would agree with you somewhat.

PETA told me that is their criteria for who can remain on the good list. Corporate Lauder is the problem here. Everyone, just once try to watch a video on animal testing. Again, we are talking about cosmetics…and torture. I have mixed issues with parent companies myself.

I feel like, as a blogger, I want to present people the most options. Avoiding a brand because of a parent company is too much for some to handle. But, for myself, I try to avoid supporting the parent companies. I wish they would at least have been more up front about it. It is! I feel like companies do that on purpose.

Sorry, not by my book. It honestly makes me respect companies who are up front about testing more. Like Wella Professionals. Their email to me was simple and sweet, something like — We have never been vegan or cruelty free. We use ingredients that are tested on animals. Awful to hear, but I appreciated their honesty about it. Can a company grow and change their policies? Should MAC have been more up front about it, especially with the temperature of the world we live in now?

But, as a consumer myself, I think for some others like myself! Please know at this moment I am now only speaking for myself and not in place of Phyrra, I simply feel compelled to respond to your questions as they resonated with me…. I know that I have mixed emotions with animal testing, especially as only in recent months have I been considering the issue.