Hdr efex pro 2 mac

• modifier partition disque dur externe mac.
• mac air price in india!
• apple mac pro release date.
• low end mac swap list!
• Nik Collection: Tom's Mac Software Pick?
• mac os x el capitan keyboard shortcuts;

And then there was Schweitzer, you know, who's name was used for the Albert Schweitzer award, using HDR techniques which took him 5 days to apply to a print who's photography was so important to his humanitarian work. Ansel Adams? Massive proponent of HDR photography, but you say he never produced a good one? Each to their own I guess. HDR efex pro is amazing. So is Silver FX Pro 2. HDR style is really the worst, ugliest most over-processed photography style imaginable. There is absolutely NO art critic that would find this look acceptable. And really, art critics are the only viewpoints that matter, since they reference the leading edge and do not care for populist appeal of the Wal Mart crowd that so many photographers love.

HDR is the equivalent of a Thomas Kinkade painting, and even looks like it. THAT'S how bad it is. Learn the subtleties of a proper naturally lit non-overprocessed photograph. Learn why the art critics love that, and learn why they hate Thomas Kinkade paintings so much,.

Using Thomas Kinkade and Walmart to support an otherwise reasonable personal point of view is simple snobbery. You are entitled to your opinion, but you do not speak for me or many others. I think HDR has its uses, and can help convey imagery that we see in our creative minds, not just the plain well exposed images with see with our eyes.

And in my line of work, art critics have no bearing whatsoever on my pay, so their opinions are utterly worthless to me. Your choice of fashion photographers as an example of "naturally lit none-over-processed" photography is suspect. It's not the processing that counts it's the subject matter. And, having said that the constant battle landscape photographers have in capturing DR is an issue.

Go look at the plethora of HDR processing that is being done without turning every photo into a Walt Disney Cartoonish look. There are some masters out there who are raising the bar in post processing without being gauche about it. I fail to see how HDR is conceptually different from burning and dodging when printing from a negative. Some people do it well. Some don't. Serious art criticism is mostly impenetrable academic jargon. I was a painter and I never knew a practicing artist who cared at all what art critics thought.

Or even had a clue what they were writing about. There are exceptions, mostly writing for popular magazines. But their populist approach was disdained by academic critics who considered them mere journalists, reviewers, not critics. Photography criticism may be better, but I doubt it.

Over the long term, tastes in the art world are influenced far more by gallery owners and serious collectors than by critics. For photography, photo editors likely have as big a role. HDR is just a tool with many uses. Some hokey and garish, others subtle. Maybe its because I come from painting, but I find most photographers too wedded to the literal, busy judging histograms and peering into shadows in search of noise instead of considering the artistic worth of the entire image.

You people are missing the joke. The giveaway was the line about art critics having the only viewpoints that matter. C'mon that was so obvious. That's only because most people way overdo it or don't do it properly. It's possible to do it and make it not even apparent. So vFunct, what camera do you use? I hope for your sake it isn't one which has been optimised to produce a high dynamic range, like say Perhaps it would be better to say "Don't do bad HDR", but then who is the ultimate judge of what is good or bad?

I'm guessing from your comments that you don't like the overly tonemapped images. Fine, no probs - but some people do like that.

Nik Software announces HDR Efex Pro 2 with improved tone-mapping

Leave them to it, stop trying to dictate other peoples taste, it honestly makes you seem like a complete moron. If you don't like it, don't look at it. I don't like it either, but neither do I like it when someone has gone way over the top with the clarity tool. Doesn't mean the clarity tool should be banned because I don't like pictures which have used it to the extreme.

As with all post processing, the best examples are those where the viewer doesn't realise it has been done. Simple as that. Oh, and by the way, saying that the only person who's viewpoint matters is an art critic is by far the stupidest thing I have seen written for a long, long time. Not all photography is fine art.

Oh and an art critic is not a qualified role. To be an art critic, one merely needs to call one self an art critic. Or more precisely one needs to actively criticise art. But to say that the photo I took of my kids for the family album is good based on an art critics point of view is ridiculous. What if an art critic slams it for poor composition yet it brings my family joy and laughter for generations. What if the "fine art" shot I took for a client is eviscerated by a critic then goes on to hang pride of place in my clients home, bringing joy for generations. Art critics, along with most opinion journalism are there to entertain the reader.

They are paid to make the public want to read their articles again,wannabes who need to validate their opinion or just be titillated by someone being rude. My own feeling is that the only real value in HDR is getting shadow detail I have wasted hours or days or weeks probably trying to get an image that is realistic, doesn't have artifacts, and doesn't lose critical detail.

But I certainly do find that manually processed bracketed exposures in most cases works extremely well and is very easy and quick to do. It's just a case of developing each image usually 2 is enough in Lightroom and then opening as layers in Photoshop, doing an Auto-Align Layers, and then blending them using a gradient or a luminosity mask, depending on how complex the image is. As Frank Zappa put it so appropriately, "The mind is like a parachute, it only works when it's open.

I guess the HDR trend is over. True, and the LightRoom can even make it better, with shadows and high lights recovery, LR4 is great on this, no need for no natural looking HDR's images. HDR has always been a tool and should be viewed as one. When I bracket my shots, I always have a shot that is properly exposed, so the HDR option is there for me but it never comes at the expense of a proper exposure. So wither you push it to th elimits to produce a very stylised and totally obvioous almist 'painted' image, or you take the bore subtle approach and produce an image that is not blatenly obviously manipulated.

But to term a specific technique rubbish is a sweeping view is wrong I am always fascinated by new software that will unleash my unlimited "creative potential". Sadly, I am usually not creative enough to take advantage of it. This new program looks like a complicated and expensive way to do what I already do with HDRtist. Some of the samples I saw on their site still show a "glow" around contrasty objects. This is a problem I have had with various HDR programs. If you have a chance, download a free trial and try it on your own images.

Kevin from Nik Software. Some Nik presets still have that glow, others don't. It is not completely consistent from picture to picture, you would have to experiment to see which preset works the best. Even the previous version usually allowed to find something that worked well. I had much better luck creating realistic rendering with Nik than with any other HDR tool. BTW, there are extra presets downloadable from Nik's site and from a few other locations.

One of the listed changes is improved ghost removal. Photomatix had much better implementation. Let's see if it changed. Does v. I preferred to use the version 1 as a stand alone software, as it worked quicker than the Plug-in. I am not sure how to launch this one outside of PS as a stand alone software?? For some reason they have decided not to make it too obvious.

The standalone version can only import JPG which limits its usefulness quite a bit. The plugin version uses Photoshop import so it is much better in this respect. I had some issues with the version 1 standalone that it crashed importing some large JPGs. Did not bother to investigate any further as the plugin did not have this problem. The EF-M 32mm F1. Find out what's new, what it's like to use and how it compares to its peers in our review in progress. The S1 and S1R are Panasonic's first full-frame mirrorless cameras so there's a plenty to talk about.

We've taken a look at the design and features of both cameras and have some initial impressions, as well. Here's the one we recommend Aimed at sports shooters it promises improved AF, including advanced subject recognition, along with the highest-ever rated image stabilization system. If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market.

In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that while they're a bit older, still offer a lot of bang for the buck. These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing.

Nik HDR Efex Pro 2 (PC/Mac): agfox.com: Software

Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier. Roger and his team at Lensrentals have switched things up and decided to build a lens rather than tearing it apart.

We'll be trying to address those comments we didn't get to in the comments.

Enhance Your Photos With the Nik Collection of Image Editors

Keep up the great work guys. Monster Photography Hooked. Thanks You might have found a new bug. I agree with Robbie that you probably want to submit a support request , but I'm curious: When you click on Preview, what happens? You might also want to make sure your video card drivers are up-to-date. Another idea is to go to the Settings dialog and try it without GPU processing. See if that makes a difference. Nik Software was originally founded in by a fellow named Nils Kokemohr hence the name of the company, which are his initials. We've had a direct focus on digital photography since Thanks for asking!

Can you hide the edit pins when working? When working on small surface I find these get in the way. Thank you for your help. Show Me Landscape Photography Tips. Portrait Photography Tips. The technique focuses on enhancing both the perceivable highlight and shadow details of an image in order to create a more balanced exposure and, ultimately, a better overall dynamic range also known as the High Dynamic Range. Many professionals in the industry have taken advantage of this advancement and produced remarkable HDR images of exceptional quality. There are now several HDR imaging application with varying capabilities in the market.

The app features a plug-in option for Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom, and Aperture. By design, HDR Efex Pro is primarily configured to function in tandem with any of the previously mentioned plugin hosts. It also works as a standalone app. Having installed the app, HDR Efex Pro grants you unrestricted access to its wide range of tools and features. Its website also features lots of video tutorials, free and informative webinars as well as learning resources all geared towards helping you get the best out of the app.

Nevertheless, its Global ghost reduction approach, at high strength, effectively handles alignment issues in a remarkable way. The app contains over 25 presets categorized into distinct groups like the Surreal, Architecture, Realistic, Landscape, Special, and Artistic — for the purpose of offering you the desired HDR effect.

Another major plus which HDR Efex contributes to the industry besides its HDR capabilities is perhaps its unique image-specific alignment and de-ghosting options. Aurora is a comprehensive, all-in-one, highly intuitive and easy-to-use soft. Aurora highlights an easy-to-use and versatile workflow for all styles of HDR that one could possibly think of.

The app features advanced tools like native RAW processing, layers, luminosity masking and more —all focused at providing you with an easier and more pleasurable way to creating superb quality HDR images. Aurora literarily combines all that the world knows about HDR imaging, and takes it years ahead. The app is faster, more powerful and more feature-rich than any known HDR program.

Both apps run on similar system requirements, differing only in OS versatility. Aurora is currently a Mac-only app. Please check your inbox.

HDR Efex Pro Overview

We've sent you a copy via email. This is sad. Please resubscribe here. How to capture adventures. And make incredible images.