Cartella font mac os x

And hey, it could be worse, it could be storing two copies of each file with the same name, one for the data and one for the resource fork, often making it impossible to access either, like pre-OSX Mac used to.

Oh Apple, why do you hate standard file formats? These days, the same effect is achieved by storing resources as individual files, most of which look pretty much like standard file formats.

Nothing wrong with metadata as such, it's just that Apple have such a knack of making up their own formats and messing up existing formats with gratuitously incompatible extensions! Having the content-type data as metadata is in itself a great thing and it saddens me that OS X is moving towards the Windows hack of file extensions as an alternative. Sigh, OSes eh? But yes, at least the format they made up for this does not do any real harm, other than slightly cluttering directory listings and wasting essentially 1 inode and 1 block per empty resource fork extracted, unless you use something like NTFS which will store the file contents in the MFT for such small files , in which case it just wastes the "inode" MFT entry.

Can be fixed after the fact by zip -d filename. It's not just resource forks, anything beyond basic file contents gets put in the AppleDouble file. Apple's moving away from resource forks, but toward things like extended attributes that'll also get stored in the AppleDouble container. You make it sound like a feature. If you want metadata, use a different format, not a Mac. Just discovered: Explanation of resource fork at Wikipedia The rest is my opinion: In brief.

This answer would be better if it was just an answer. The extended ranting about stupid programmers and lazy users detracts from it. Resource forks were a really nice!

How twistedly do you have to define "metadata" and "user's data space" to say that? You must hate filesystems! Man, you must also hate all kind of user interfaces, and libraries, and abstraction, and This does not answer the question. I guess people are upvoting this just because they agree with the rant? While I agree that the emotionally-charged tone is not helpful, I also absolutely agree that creating hidden things that are occasionally needed is a really bad idea, precisely as stated in this answer: These files should either be visible, or the data should be embedded in the files in some manner that is flagged as "skippable" by other OS's.

2. Font Panel

JP says: November 17, at 1: January 27, at 8: October 12, at 6: Deirdre says: November 29, at 5: December 20, at Mike says: October 23, at Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply. Shop on Amazon. Subscribe to OSXDaily. Follow OSXDaily. News - Beta 3 of MacOS This website and third-party tools use cookies for functional, analytical, and advertising purposes.

By continuing to browse the site, closing this banner, scrolling this webpage, or clicking a link, you agree to these cookies. You can review our privacy policy for additional information.

Your Answer

Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Accessing Mac mactex install folder Ask Question. I am forced to use a Mac for a while. My log-file says my class file is in: I can't find it in my finder.

Sorry for this stupid questions but I'm not used to working on a Mac. Elmer Elmer 2 11 To find where a given package is installed, you can open a terminal and type: You can find out what this is by typing: At some point you may need to run: The command: I'm afraid I have no clue why these wouldn't show up in Mac's finder.

I don't use a mac.

Now knowing these commands. I prefer it over Windows tbh. The logic is that the local folder is small, so the time saving from a database is not really important. Thanks Joseph.