Mac os x lion server windows clients

So if you want to change the licence of the whole linux kernel project, you should ask the permission of all contributors. Apple doing its own cifs stacks? Reply 10 of Reply 11 of Originally Posted by mbarriault I believe, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the primary idealogical difference comes down to "source code must be available" covers in derived works. In GPLv2, you can use a source work, if you modify it then you have to provide source for those modifications, but if your code just works with it then you don't have to open-source your own code.

Under GPLv3 you can't use an open-source component without being entirely open-source yourself. According to Stallman, the most important changes are in relation to software patents, free software license compatibility, the definition of "source code", and hardware restrictions on software modification "tivoization". A second major area was how to deal with software patents. We decided that the implicit patent licences that we were relying on in GPL version two, were not solid enough so we put in an explicit grant of patent licence on the part of whoever distributes the software.

This follows various other free software licences that came out during the 90s. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions: You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License.

How Mountain Lion Server Stacks Up To Windows Server [Feature]

You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License. Reply 12 of Originally Posted by oomu it seems difficult to believe Apple can recreate a complete cifs stacks from scratch.

Originally Posted by oomu Linux Torvalds is not against the gpl 3. Reply 13 of Originally Posted by Booga This is simply false. Reply 14 of Linux Torvalds is not against the gpl 3.

• Welcome Server.app; good-bye Server Admin—sort of.
• How Mountain Lion Server Stacks Up To Windows Server [Feature] | Cult of Mac!
• Where did the controls go?.

Reply 15 of Anyway, you can continue GPLv3 is more strict on CopyLeft. In short, Apache agreed to the GPLv3 terms to make it compatible. Apple refuses to agree to the terms. GPLv2 is less restrictive on the Copyleft requirements. You'll have to install those packages on your own and thus lose the former integration. It's one reason MacPorts exists. Reply 16 of March 23, 4: I am naive when it comes to this, but does this mean SMB is going to be a lot more reliable? Reply 17 of And you are right, despite not providing any reference or insight.

Oh, and your bad english and syntax, does not inspire much confidence in your understanding of licences Wrong here too. To quote Linus: Things that have been valid under v2 are no longer valid under v3, so changing the license has real downsides. In and of itself, this is nothing new. All post-enablement SNMP configuration happens in text files and the command line.

Stay ahead with the world's most comprehensive technology and business learning platform.

In some cases, especially with the Web server, this is a bit of a shock, because the differences in the GUI between versions In the case of iChat server, the differences are rather minor. The lack of a GUI is upsetting, but in light of what Apple thinks of as its main customer base, this makes some sense.

• Mac OS X Lion Server For Dummies;
• dell switch show mac address table?
• 77 Comments.
• Set Up OS X Lion Server - Open Directory and Network Users.
• imagemagick xampp mac os x.
• panasonic hdc tm900 compatible with mac?
• RELATED ARTICLES.

Apache provides the back end for the Web UI in things like Profile Manager; you need it for the Wiki service, file sharing for iOS devices, and other services. Not really.

Another problem with Lion Server is that so little of this is documented. You have to be in Server. That will take you to http: If you go to http: This is the issue I have with Lion Server as a whole: Take a simple task like file sharing: You go to the File Sharing section to enable sharing, and you can set some basic permissions, but if you want to set anything beyond read only, write only, or read-write, then you have to go to the hardware settings, then storage, and then you can set more-detailed ACLs.

For Apple, the state of the server-management GUIs is bad, almost approaching appalling. Prior to Lion Server, OS X used Samba , an excellent open-source project that allows non-Windows platforms to both access and serve files as a Windows server. Lion Server provides only basic file sharing.

Microsoft has been running away from NT 4 domains since You no longer need a special program to set up print sharing, which is an advantage.

Why IT won't like Mac OS X Lion Server | InfoWorld

If you have to do a lot of extensive print sharing, consider keeping your print server at version Profile Manager is the one shining star in Lion Server. Users can go to a Web portal https: The setup for managing Macs, iOS devices, or both is similar to the iPhone Configuration Utility that Apple used to use as its primary configuration tool for iOS devices. Configuration profiles are distributed as digitally signed XML. Need to remote-wipe an iPad?

Why You Need a Lion Server

You can do that from Profile Manager. Need to force complex passphrases on your iPhones? Even the documentation for Profile Manager, once you get to it, is solid. In Lion Server, Apple has reached farther than it has since version With all the changes, every administrator using a previous version of OS X Server needs to think carefully before moving to Lion Server.

Lion Server has some major bugs, like a problem with authentication against OpenLDAP directories, and a series of issues with Active Directory integration.